** متابعات ثقافية متميزة ** Blogs al ssadh
هل تريد التفاعل مع هذه المساهمة؟ كل ما عليك هو إنشاء حساب جديد ببضع خطوات أو تسجيل الدخول للمتابعة.

** متابعات ثقافية متميزة ** Blogs al ssadh

موقع للمتابعة الثقافية العامة
 
 By Individual Philosopher > Johann Gottlieb Fichte I_icon_mini_portalالرئيسيةالأحداثالمنشوراتأحدث الصورالتسجيلدخول



مدونات الصدح ترحب بكم وتتمنى لك جولة ممتازة

وتدعوكم الى دعمها بالتسجيل والمشاركة

عدد زوار مدونات الصدح

إرسال موضوع جديد   إرسال مساهمة في موضوع
 

  By Individual Philosopher > Johann Gottlieb Fichte

اذهب الى الأسفل 
كاتب الموضوعرسالة
free men
فريق العمـــــل *****
free men


التوقيع : رئيس ومنسق القسم الفكري

عدد الرسائل : 1500

الموقع : center d enfer
تاريخ التسجيل : 26/10/2009
وســــــــــام النشــــــــــــــاط : 6

 By Individual Philosopher > Johann Gottlieb Fichte Empty
08032016
مُساهمة By Individual Philosopher > Johann Gottlieb Fichte


 By Individual Philosopher > Johann Gottlieb Fichte Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
(Pencil & ink portrait, Humboldt University Library, Berlin)
Introduction
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762 - 1814) was a German philosopher, and one of thefounding figures of the German Idealism and Kantianism movements in the late 18th and early 19th Centuries.
At one time perceived merely as a bridge between the ideas of Kant and Hegel, he has since begun to be appreciated as an important philosopher in his own right, withoriginal insights into the nature of self-awareness. He also wrote Political Philosophy, and is thought of by some as the father of German Nationalism.
Life
Fichte (pronounced FIC-ta) was born on 19 May 1762 in Rammenau in the Saxony region of eastern Germany. His family were ribbon makers and too poor to pay for his schooling, although early in life he impressed everyone with his great intelligence. Through the patronage of a local nobleman, Baron Miltitz, he was able to attend the well-known Pforta boarding school, which prepared students for a university education, and in 1780, he began study at the University of Jena in central Germany, and then at the University of Leipzig. With the death of his patron, he had to break off his studies for financial reasons in 1784, and left without completing his degree.
He worked as a private tutor in Zürich, Switzerland for a time, where he met, and became engaged to, his future wife Johanna Rahn, niece of the German poet F. G. Klopstock, in 1790. Later the same year, (back in Leipzig and again in financial distress), Fichte agreed to tutor a university student in the Kantian philosophy, about which he knew very little at the time, and so began to study in depth the works ofImmanuel Kant, which were to have a lasting effect on his life and thought.
The next year, he travelled to Königsberg to meet Kant himself, although Kant was apparently not especially impressed by his visitor. But in 1792, Fichte published his hastily prepared first work, "Versuch einer Kritik aller Offenbarung" ("Attempt at a Critique of All Revelation"), an unsigned book which was initially assumed to be by Kant himself. When Kant cleared the confusion and openly praised the work and its author, Fichte's reputation skyrocketed.
Fichte continued working as a tutor while attempting to fashion his philosophical insights into a system of his own, which he came to call Wissenschaftslehre (variously translated as "Science of Knowledge", "Doctrine of Science", or "Theory of Science"). In October 1793, he married his fiancée in Zürich, (they were to have a son, Immanuel Hermann, in 1797), and shortly thereafter was offered the chair in philosophy at the University of Jena, which was rapidly becoming the capital of the new German philosophy.
He stayed at Jena until 1799, publishing the scholarly works that established his reputation as one of the major figures in the German philosophical tradition, as well as more popular works for the general public (to fulfill his desire to communicateKantianism to the wider world). In a 1798 essay, Fichte argued that religious belief could be legitimate only insofar as it arose from properly moral considerations, and that God has no existence apart from the moral world order. This led to accusations of unothodoxy and Atheism and he was ultimately forced to leave Jena.
By the time Fichte settled in Berlin in 1800, his reputation had already started to wane, particularly after disavowals of hisWissenschaftslehre by Kant and by Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (1743 - 1819). To earn a living, he gave private lectures and published new works, including "Die Bestimmung des Menschen" ("The Vocation of Man") in 1800, although he was loath to publish for fear of being misunderstood again. When the newly founded Prussian university in Berlin opened in 1810, Fichte was made the head of the philosophy faculty, and in 1811 he was elected the first rector of the university. He continued his philosophical work until the very end of his life, lecturing on the Wissenschaftslehre and writing on Political Philosophy (including on a new form of national education that would enable the German nation to achieve its full potential) and other subjects.
When the War of Liberation against Napoleon Bonaparte broke out in 1813, both Fichte and his wife Johanna joined the militia. He died in Berlin from a typhus epidemic on 27 January 1814, at the age of fifty-two. His son, Immanuel Hermann Fichte (1797 - 1879), also made contributions to philosophy.
WorkBack to Top
After the publication of some radical works defending the principles of the French Revolution in 1793, Fichte began working in earnest on the formulation of his philosophy of Wissenschaftslehre which he continued to revise for most of the rest of his life. He saw it as a the search for new foundations for Kant's Critical philosophy, although never as a repudiation of Kantianism. Following on from the "Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre" ("Foundations of the Entire Wissenschaftslehre") of 1794/5, came "Grundlage des Naturrechts nach Principien der Wissenschaftslehre" ("Foundations of Natural Right Based on the Wissenschaftslehre", 1796/7) and "Das System der Sittenlehre nach den Principien der Wissenschaftslehre"("System of Ethical Theory Based on the Wissenschaftslehre", 1798). Other re-formulations, explanations and digests followed.
Fichte realized, largely in response to a work called "Aenesidemus" by Gottlob Ernst Schulze (1761 - 1833), that he did not endorse Kant's argument for the existence of noumena ("things in themselves"), the supra-sensible reality beyond the categories of human reason, and saw the rigorous and systematic separation of "things in themselves" and things "as they appear to us" as an invitation to Skepticism. He made the radical suggestion that we should accept the fact thatconsciousness does not have any grounding in a so-called "real world" or indeed in anything outside of itself. However, he argued, consciousness of the self depends upon resistance by something that is understood as not part of the self (his famous"I / not-I" distinction) i.e. the existence of other rational subjects.
In 1806, he published "Die Grundzüge des gegenwärtigen Zeitalters" ("The Characteristics of the Present Age"), employing his Wissenschaftslehre for the purposes of the Philosophy of History, and identifying five stages of history in which the human race progresses, from the rule of instinct to the rule of reason. Despite (or possibly because of) parallels with Hegel's later formulation of history as a dialectical process, it was arguably Hegel himself who was largely responsible for the subsequent relegation of Fichte to a footnote in the larger history of German Idealism.
Fichte also originated the principle of Rational Voluntarism, arguing that the world and all its activity is only to be understood asmaterial for the activity of the practical reason, which is the means through which the will achieves complete freedom and complete moral realization.

Fichte's later political writings were in stark contrast to his early radical and progressive works. He developed a theory of the state based on the idea of self-sufficiency (autarky), which would control international relations, the value of money, and severely limit trade with the outside world. He also called Jews a "state within a state" that could "undermine" the German nation, and ecouraged the building of a national Jewish state in Palestine. His "Reden an die deutsche Nation" ("Addresses to the German Nation") of 1807-8 in particular was used by German nationalist circles before and during the First World War to enhance national sentiments, and he is thought of by some as the father of German Nationalism.
الرجوع الى أعلى الصفحة اذهب الى الأسفل
مُشاطرة هذه المقالة على: reddit

By Individual Philosopher > Johann Gottlieb Fichte :: تعاليق

free men
رد: By Individual Philosopher > Johann Gottlieb Fichte
مُساهمة الثلاثاء مارس 08, 2016 4:17 am من طرف free men

Back to Top
Philosophy of History (or Historiosophy) is an area of philosophy concerning the eventual significance, if any, of human history, and asks if there is any designpurposedirective principle, or finality in the processes of human history.
It asks questions such as: "Are there any broad patterns or cycles in the progress in human history?", "If history can indeed be said to progress, what is its ultimate direction?", "What is the driving force of progress in human history?", "What purpose does the recording of history serve?"
Ancient EraBack to Top
In Ancient Greece, historiography (the processes by which historical knowledge is obtained and transmitted) was considered more for good examples to follow than for factual accuracy (i.e. it was supposed to morally improve the reader), and any bad examples may just have been conveniently ignored. Revered historians like Herodotus and Plutarch freely invented speeches for their historical figures and selectively chose their subjects.
History (as contemporarily understood by Western thought), tends to follow an assumption of linear progression, although many ancient cultures believed that history was cyclical with alternating Dark and Golden Ages. In the 14th century, the Arab MuslimIbn Khaldun (1332 - 1406), considered one of the fathers of the Philosophy of History, discussed his philosophy of history and society in detail in his "Muqaddimah", propounding a cyclical theory of history. During the Enlightenment, history began to be seen as both linear and irreversible, although as empires came and went with great regularity in Europe, the idea of history following cycles also recurred regularly.
Those who created theodicies (attempts to reconcile the co-existence of evil and God), including St AugustineSt Thomas Aquinas and Gottfried Leibniz, claimed that history had a progressive direction leading to an eschatological end (the end of the world or of humankind) such as the Apocalypse.
Modern EraBack to Top
It was really not until the 19th Century that the idea of presenting objective historical facts became prevalent. Hegel, through his theory of dialectics (thesis followed by opposing antithesis), conceived of the negative historical events, such as wars, etc, as the motor of history. The positivist conception of history of Auguste Comte, (that knowledge can only come from positive affirmation of theories through strict scientific method), was one of the most influential doctrines of progress in the 19th Century.
Darwinism, and the Social Darwinism it gave rise to, claimed that societies start out in a primitive state and gradually become more civilized over time, thus equating the culture and technology of Western civilisation with progress. Ernst Haeckel(1884 -1919), who formulated his Recapitulation Theory in 1867, stated that the evolution of each individual (from embryo to child to adult) reproduces the species' evolution (from primitive to modern society).
The 19th Century historian Thomas Carlyle (1795 - 1881), echoing Hegel before him, argued that history was the biography of a few central individuals or heroesHegel also championed the idea of Historicism (that there is an organic succession of developments, and that local conditions and peculiarities influence the results in a decisive way).
It was not until the late 19th Century that Marx's conception of a materialist history (see the sections on Materialism andMarxism) based on the class struggle raised attention to the importance of social factors such as economics in the unfolding of history.

More recently, Michel Foucault has posited that the victors of a social struggle use their political dominance to suppress a defeated adversary's version of historical events in favour of their own propaganda, which may go so far as historical revisionism, as in the cases of Nazism and Stalinism.
 

By Individual Philosopher > Johann Gottlieb Fichte

الرجوع الى أعلى الصفحة 

صفحة 1 من اصل 1

 مواضيع مماثلة

-
» Johann Gottlieb Fichte
»  By Individual Philosopher > Pythagoras
»  By Individual Philosopher > Maimonides
»  By Individual Philosopher > Pyrrho
»  By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle

صلاحيات هذا المنتدى:تستطيع الرد على المواضيع في هذا المنتدى
** متابعات ثقافية متميزة ** Blogs al ssadh :: Pensée-
إرسال موضوع جديد   إرسال مساهمة في موضوعانتقل الى: