** متابعات ثقافية متميزة ** Blogs al ssadh
هل تريد التفاعل مع هذه المساهمة؟ كل ما عليك هو إنشاء حساب جديد ببضع خطوات أو تسجيل الدخول للمتابعة.
** متابعات ثقافية متميزة ** Blogs al ssadh

موقع للمتابعة الثقافية العامة
 
الرئيسيةالرئيسية  الأحداثالأحداث  المنشوراتالمنشورات  أحدث الصورأحدث الصور  التسجيلالتسجيل  دخول  



مدونات الصدح ترحب بكم وتتمنى لك جولة ممتازة

وتدعوكم الى دعمها بالتسجيل والمشاركة

عدد زوار مدونات الصدح

 

  By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle

اذهب الى الأسفل 
كاتب الموضوعرسالة
free men
فريق العمـــــل *****
free men


التوقيع : رئيس ومنسق القسم الفكري

عدد الرسائل : 1500

الموقع : center d enfer
تاريخ التسجيل : 26/10/2009
وســــــــــام النشــــــــــــــاط : 6

  By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle Empty
08032016
مُساهمة By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle

 
  By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle Aristotle
Aristotle
(Roman copy of a lost bronze sculpture by Lysippos, 1st or 2nd Century)
Introduction
Aristotle (384 - 322 B.C.) was an important Greek philosopher from the Socratic (orClassical) period, mainly based in Athens. He is one of the most importantfounding figures in Western Philosophy, and the first to create a comprehensive system of philosophy, encompassing EthicsAestheticsPoliticsMetaphysics,Logic and science.
His own school of philosophy, known as Aristotelianism or the Peripatetic School, influenced almost all later philosophical thinking, particularly the Medieval movements such as ScholasticismAverroism and Avicennism.
Life
Aristotle was born to an aristocratic family in Stageira on the Chalcidice Peninsula of Macedonia (a region of northern Greece) in 384 B.C. His father, Nicomachus, was the personal physician to King Amyntas of Macedon, and Aristotle was trained and educated as a member of the aristocracy. Aristotle's mother, Phaestis, came from Chalcis on the island of Euboea, and her family owned property there.
When he was just a boy of the age of 10, Aristotle's father died (which meant that Aristotle could not now follow in his father's profession of doctor) and his mother seems also to have died young, so he was taken under the care of a man namedProxenus. At the age of 18, he moved to Athens to compete his education atPlato's famous Academy, where he remained for nearly twenty years (first as a starstudent and then as a teacher and a philosophical force to be reckoned with in his own right) until after Plato's death in 347B.C.
Plato's nephew Speusippus (407 - 339 B.C.) was chosen to succeed him as head of the Academy (partly because Aristotle's ideas had diverged too far from Plato's) and Aristotle left the Academy. He travelled for some time in Asia Minor withXenocrates (396 - 314 B.C.) and Theophrastus (371 - 287 B.C.). While staying at the court of Hermias of Atarneus, an ex-student of Plato, he met and married Hermias' daughter, Pythias, and together they had a daughter also called Pythias. After Hermias' death, Aristotle was invited by Philip of Macedon to tutor to the young Alexander the Great, which he did for several years before returning to Athens. His wife Pythias died soon after, and Aristotle became involved with Herpyllis from his home town of Stageira, and they had a son named after Aristotle's father, Nicomachus.
In 335 B.C., Aristotle established his own school just outside the walls of Athens, known as the Lyceum, in competition withPlato's long-established Academy, and he conducted courses at the school for the next thirteen years. His immediate followers were known as the Peripatetics (meaning "itinerant" or "walking about", for their habit of walking the covered walkways of the Lyceum). The Lyceum had a broader curriculum than the Academy, and a stronger emphasis on natural philosophy. Artistotle's most famous students were Theophrastus (371 - 287 B.C.), who followed Artistotle as head of the Lyceum, andStrato of Lampsacus (225 - 269 B.C.) who succeeded him.
It is during this period in Athens that Aristotle is believed to have composed many of his major works, although only fragmentsof his many dialogues have survived, and those mainly in treatise form, generally thought to be lecture aids for his students. His most important treatises include the six books of the "Organon""Physics""Metaphysics""Nicomachean Ethics","Politics""De Anima" ("On the Soul"), "Rhetoric" and "Poetics".
On the death of Alexander the Great in 323 B.C.anti-Macedonian sentiment in Athens flared once again, and Aristotle fled the city to his mother's family estate in Chalcis, explaining "I will not allow the Athenians to sin twice against philosophy" (a reference to the trial and execution of Socrates). He soon died of natural causes there, at the age of 62, and was eventuallyburied next to his wife.
WorkBack to Top
Aristotle wrote extensively, but only about one-fifth of his works have survived (although even that fills about 12 volumes, and touches on the whole range of what was available knowledge at his time).
Aristotle himself divided his writings into the "exoteric" (intended for publication) and the "esoteric" (compiled from his lecture notes, and intended for the narrower audience of his students and other philosophers familiar with the jargon and issues typical of the Platonic and Aristotelian schools). Unfortunately, none of the exoteric works he produced for publication (which were praised throughout antiquity for their great beauty of style) seem to have survived, not even fragments, and so we have no examples of his literary art, as we have of Plato's writing.
Even some of his esoteric works may well have been altered or "repaired" after the original manuscripts were left to languish in a cellar in Asia Minor before being rediscovered by some Roman scholars of dubious reputation in the 1st Century B.C. (although this account of their history is disputed). It was not until the Scholasticism and Averroism of the Middle Ages (when he was known simply as "The Philosopher") that Latin translations became widely available again, stimulating a revival ofAristotelianism in Europe, and ultimately revitalizing European thought through Muslim influence in Spain to fan the embers of the Renaissance.
What we today call Aristotelian Logic, Aristotle himself would have labelled "analytics", and he used the term "logic" to meandialectics (the exchange of arguments and counter-arguments in search of a synthesis or resolution). Aristotle's ground-breaking work on Logic were collected together into the six books of the "Organon" in the early 1st Century A.D., and it constitutes theearliest formal study of Logic. His conception of Logic has had an unparalleled influence on the history of Western thought, and was the dominant form of Logic until 19th Century advances in mathematical logic and predicate logic. As recently as the late 18th Century, no less a philosopher than Immanuel Kant claimed that Aristotle had said all there was to say on the subject of Logic.
His aim was to develop a universal method of reasoning by means of which it would be possible to learn everything there is to know about reality. Aristotle defined logic as "new and necessary reasoning", "new" because it allows us to learn what we do not know, and "necessary" because its conclusions are inescapable.
At the heart of Aristotelian Logic is the syllogism (or deductive logic or term logic), which he developed in his "Prior Analytics", the third book of the "Organon". In a syllogism, one proposition (the conclusion) is inferred from two others (thepremises), each of which has one term in common with the conclusion. A proposition in this context is an assertion which consists of two terms (the subject and the predicate), and which is capable of truth or falsity. He enumerated ten categoriesto describe all the possible kinds of thing which can be the subject or the predicate of a proposition: Substance, Quantity, Quality, Relation, Place, Time, Position, State, Action and Affection. In other books of the "Organon", Aristotle considers issues in constructing valid argumentsprobable inferences (as opposed to certain ones) and logical fallacies, among other topics.
Aristotle also popularized the use of axioms (self-evident principles requiring no proof), claiming that nothing can be deduced if nothing is assumed, as well as the hugely important Principle of Non-Contradiction, which held that a particular attribute can not both apply and not apply to the same subject at the same time (e.g. 2 + 2 = 4 and 2 + 2 = 5 cannot both apply). The use of axioms was important in other areas of Aristotle's philosophy, not least in his Metaphysics.
Aristotle's Metaphysics (the very word "metaphysics" dates back to Aristotle, originally having the rather mundane meaning of those books which come after his work on physics) revolves around the concept of substance, which is a combination of bothmatter (the substratum or "stuff" of which a thing is composed) and form (the actual thing itself). Things have both potentiality(what it is capable of doing or becoming, if not prevented by something else) and actuality (the fulfillment or the end of the potentiality). Thus, the matter of a thing is its potentiality, and the form is its actuality. Essence is what provides the shape or form or purpose to matter, and the movement from formless stuff to complete being results from four causesmaterial cause(what something is made of, the coming together of it parts), efficient cause (the motion or energy that changes matter), formal cause (a thing’s shape, form, essence or definition) and final cause (a thing's reason or purpose or the intention behind it).
Aristotle tried to pin down what it is that persists in a thing that gives it its continuity as a single thing, even while its properties and attributes change (e.g. a leaf starts as a bud, grows and turns green, and then withers and dies, but it remains throughout incontestably the same leaf). He also asked what are the fundamental properties of a thing which give it its identity as a particular thing, and without which it would cease to be the same thing. He saw these two questions as inextricably entwined.
Aristotle broke irrevocably with his teacher Plato and the Platonists over the problem of universals and his conception ofhylomorphism (the idea that substances are forms inhering in matter). Aristotle's conception of hylomorphism differed from that of Plato in that he held that Form and Matter are inseparable, and that matter and form do not exist apart from each other, but only together. Just as the word hylomorphism itself is composed of the Greek hyle (matter or stuff) and morphe (form or structure), Aristotle's classic answer to the question of what reality really consists of was that reality = stuff + structure. Stuff without structure was mere chaos, while structure without stuff was no more than the ghost of being.
Plato believed that ideal Forms exist, separate and apart from particular things, for which they are prototypes or exemplars. Aristotle, on the other hand, held that universals exist only where they are instantiated, and then only "in things", never apart from them (i.e. the universals are “inside” the particulars). Where Plato had located ultimate reality in ideas or eternal Forms, knowable only through reflection and reason, Aristotle saw ultimate reality in physical objects, knowable through experience. Indeeed, he considered it meaningless to discuss something which has not been encountered or experienced in real life. ForPlato, the philosophic method means the descent from a knowledge of universal Forms (or ideas) to a contemplation ofparticular imitations of these, while for Aristotle the philosophic method implies the ascent from the study of particular phenomena to the knowledge of essences.
Aristotle made some highly influential constributions to the field of Ethics. He considered Ethics to be a practical science (i.e. mastered by doing rather than merely reasoning) but also a general, rather than a certain, knowledge. Unlike some other moral philosophers before him, Aristotle started by posing the very general question of what it actually means to lead a good human life. He was also very aware that morality is a complex concept and so cannot be measured in any one simple way (in the way that Utilitarianism, for example, measures morality on a simple scale of happiness created). Also (again, unlike some other philosophers such as the Stoics and the Epicureans, for example), Aristotle firmly believed that we are not self-contained moral entities and that we cannot control our own moral environment.
His several treatises on Ethics, most notably the "Nichomachean Ethics", outline what is commonly called Virtue Ethics orEudaimonism. He argued that Man must have a specific or proper function, which is uncommon to anything else, and which is an activity of the soul. The best activity of the soul is eudaimonia (happiness or joy or the good life), which can be achieved by living a balanced life and avoiding excess by pursuing a golden mean in everything between the two vices of excess and deficiency.
In Politics, Aristotle was the first to conceive of an organic city or natural community, and indeed conceived of Politics as a whole as organic, as a collection of parts that cannot exist without the others. For Aristotle, a city (the political unit with which he was familiar, the concept of the state as we know it still being then unknown) was a political partnership which existed for the sake of "noble actions", not merely for the sake of living together, nor as a social contract to avoid injustice or economic instability. In comparison with some other political commentators of the time (such as Plato), though, Aristotle's had a rathernarrow-minded view of just who should be allowed to be a citizen of such a city, and his attitude to women and foreigners in general was quite chauvinistic. His formula for political stability was a strong middle class in order to achieve the middle ground between tyranny and democracy. He may also have been the author of a model constitution of Athens, in which the abstract notion of constitutional government is applied to the concrete life of a particular society.
Aristotle's philosophical endeavours encompassed virtually all facets of intellectual inquiry, including "natural philosophy", the branch of philosophy examining the phenomena of the natural world (what would be regarded today as physicsbiologyand other natural sciences). In fact, he spent much of his time performing original research in the natural sciences, in areas such as botany, zoology, physics, astronomy, chemistry, meteorology and several other sciences, and to a large extent Aristotle was responsible for establishing these sciences as individual fields of enquiry and study. He was endlessly fascinated with nature, and went a long way towards classifying the plants and animals of Greece through observation and anatomical dissection.
In Aristotle's physics there are five elements, all of which naturally move towards their default natural place: fire (hot and dry),earth (cold and dry), air (hot and wet); water (cold and wet) and aether (the divine substance that makes up the stars and planets). In his treatise "Meteorology" (then a broader term than its use today), he discussed the nature of the earth and theoceans, including the hydrologic cycle and natural occurences like winds, earthquakes, thunder, lightning, rainbows, and meteors, comets and the Milky Way. His "De Anima" ("On the Soul") is perhaps the first ever book on psychology. In it, he argued that the mind is essentially the purposeful functioning of the nervous system, and he described the struggle of the id andego (desire and reason).
Unlike Plato, Aristotle took observation to be crucial, but (in the absence of concepts like mass, velocity, force and temperature, and given his insistence on deriving "laws of the universe" from simple observation and over-stretched reason, rather than strict scientific method, and his largely qualitative rather than quantitative approach) his scientific observationsare a mixture of precocious accuracy and curious errors, and have long been deemed hopelessly inadequate. However, his project of a systematic investigation into natural phenomena in the living world arguably marks the birth of empirical science.

Aristotle was interested in more than a strictly scientific exploration of human nature, though, as testified by works like the"Poetics" and "Rhetoric". Aristotle considered literature (e.g. epic poetry, tragedy, comedy), music and dance to be essentially imitative, although he considered such imitiation to be natural to mankind and one of mankind's major advantagesover animals.
الرجوع الى أعلى الصفحة اذهب الى الأسفل
مُشاطرة هذه المقالة على: reddit

By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle :: تعاليق

free men
رد: By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle
مُساهمة الثلاثاء مارس 08, 2016 2:53 am من طرف free men
  By Historical Period > Ancient > Socratic

The Socratic or Classical period of the Ancient era of philosophy denotes the Greek contemporaries and near contemporaries of the influential philosopher Socrates.

It includes the following major philosophers:

Socrates (464 - 399 B.C.) Greek
Plato (c. 428 - 348 B.C.) Greek
Diogenes of Sinope (c. 412 - 323 B.C.) Greek
Aristotle (384 - 322 B.C.) Greek 

Socrates developed a system of critical reasoning in order to work out how to live properly and to tell the difference between right and wrong. He and his followers, Plato and Aristotle maintained an unwavering commitment to the truth, and between them they organized and systematized most of the problems of philosophy.

Important philosophical movements of the period include CynicismHedonismPlatonism and Aristotelianism.
free men
رد: By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle
مُساهمة الثلاثاء مارس 08, 2016 2:53 am من طرف free men
IntroductionBack to Top
Aesthetics is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and appreciation of artbeauty and good taste. It has also been defined as "critical reflection on art, culture and nature". The word "aesthetics" derives from the Greek "aisthetikos", meaning "of sense perception". Along with Ethics, aesthetics is part of axiology (the study of values and value judgements).
In practise we distinguish between aesthetic judgements (the appreciation of any object, not necessarily an art object) andartistic judgements (the appreciation or criticism of a work of art). Thus aesthetics is broader in scope than the philosophy of art. It is also broader than the philosophy of beauty, in that it applies to any of the responses we might expect works of art or entertainment to elicit, whether positive or negative.
Aestheticians ask questions like "What is a work of art?", "What makes a work of art successful?", "Why do we find certain things beautiful?", "How can things of very different categories be considered equally beautiful?", "Is there a connection between art and morality?", "Can art be a vehicle of truth?", "Are aesthetic judgements objective statements or purely subjective expressions of personal attitudes?", "Can aesthetic judgements be improved or trained?"
In very general terms, it examines what makes something beautifulsublimedisgustingfuncutesillyentertaining,pretentiousdiscordantharmoniousboringhumorous or tragic.
Aesthetic JudgementsBack to Top
Judgements of aesthetic value rely on our ability to discriminate at a sensory level, but they usually go beyond that. Judgments of beauty are sensoryemotional, and intellectual all at once.
According to Immanuel Kant, beauty is objective and universal (i.e. certain things are beautiful to everyone). But there is a second concept involved in a viewer's interpretation of beauty, that of taste, which is subjective and varies according to class,cultural background and education.
In fact, it can be argued that all aesthetic judgements are culturally conditioned to some extent, and can change over time(e.g. Victorians in Britain often saw African sculpture as ugly, but just a few decades later, Edwardian audiences saw the same sculptures as being beautiful).
Judgments of aesthetic value can also become linked to judgements of economicpolitical or moral value (e.g. we might judge an expensive car to be beautiful partly because it is desirable as a status symbol, or we might judge it to be repulsive partly because it signifies for us over-consumption and offends our political or moral values.)
Aestheticians question how aesthetic judgements can be unified across art forms (e.g. we can call a person, a house, a symphony, a fragrance and a mathematical proof beautiful, but what characteristics do they share which give them that status?)
It should also be borne in kind that the imprecision and ambiguity arising from the use of language in aesthetic judgements can lead to much confusion (e.g. two completely different feelings derived from two different people can be represented by an identical expression, and conversely a very similar response can be articulated by very different language).
What is Art?Back to Top
In recent years, the word “art” is roughly used as an abbreviation for creative art or fine art, where some skill is being used to express the artist’s creativity, or to engage the audience’s aesthetic sensibilities, or to draw the audience towards consideration of the “finer” things. If the skill being used is more lowbrow or practical, the word "craft" is often used instead of art. Similarly, if the skill is being used in a commercial or industrial way, it may be considered "design" (or "applied art"). Some have argued, though, that the difference between fine art and applied art or crafts has more to do with value judgments made about the art than any clear definitional difference.
Since the Dadaist art movement of the early 20th Century, it can no longer even be assumed that all art aims at beauty. Some have argued that whatever art schools and museums and artists get away with should be considered art, regardless of formal definitions (the so-called institutional definition of art).
Some commentators (including John Dewey) suggest that it is the process by which a work of art is created or viewed that makes it art, not any inherent feature of an object or how well received it is by the institutions of the art world (e.g. if a writerintended a piece to be a poem, it is one whether other poets acknowledge it or not, whereas if exactly the same set of words was written by a journalist as notes, these would not constitute a poem).
Others, including Leo Tolstoy (1828 - 1910), claim that what makes something art (or not) is how it is experienced by its audience, not the intention of its creator.
Functionalists like Monroe Beardsley (1915 - 1985) argue that whether or not a piece counts as art depends on what function it plays in a particular context (e.g. the same Greek vase may play a non-artistic function in one context - carrying wine - and anartistic function in another context).
At the metaphysical and ontological level, when we watch, for example, a play being performed, are we judging one work of art (the whole performance), or are we judging separately the writing of the play, the direction and setting, the performances of the various actors, the costumes, etc? Similar considerations also apply to music, painting, etc. Since the rise of conceptual art in the 20th Century, the problem is even more acute (e.g. what exactly are we judging when we look at Andy Warhol's Brillo Boxes?)
Aestheticians also question what the value of art is. Is art a means of gaining some kind of knowledge? Is it a tool ofeducation or indoctrination or enculturation? Is it perhaps just politics by other means? Does art give us an insight into thehuman condition? Does it make us more moral? Can it uplift us spiritually? Might the value of art for the artist be quite different than its value for the audience? Might the value of art to society be different than its value to individuals?
Aesthetic UniversalsBack to Top
The contemporary American philosopher Denis Dutton (1944 - ) has identified seven universal signatures in human aesthetics. Although there are possible exceptions and objections to many of them, they represent a useful starting point for the consideration of aesthetics:

  • Expertise or Virtuosity (technical artistic skills are cultivated, recognized and admired)

  • Non-Utilitarian Pleasure (people enjoy art for art's sake, and don't demand practical value of it)

  • Style (artistic objects and performances satisfy rules of composition that place them in recognizable styles)

  • Criticism (people make a point of judging, appreciating and interpreting works of art)

  • Imitation (with a few important exceptions (e.g. music, abstract painting), works of art simulate experiences of the world)

  • Special Focus (art is set aside from ordinary life and made a dramatic focus of experience)

  • Imagination (artists and their audiences entertain hypothetical worlds in the theatre of the imagination)


History of AestheticsBack to Top
The Ancient Greek philosophers initially felt that aesthetically appealing objects were beautiful in and of themselvesPlato felt that beautiful objects incorporated proportionharmony and unity among their parts. Aristotle found that the universal elements of beauty were ordersymmetry and definiteness.
According to Islam, human works of art are inherently flawed compared to the work of Allah, and to attempt to depict in a realistic form any animal or person is insolence to Allah. This has had the effect of narrowing the field of Muslim artistic possibility to such forms as mosaicscalligraphyarchitecture and geometric and floral patterns.
Indian art evolved with an emphasis on inducing special spiritual or philosophical states in the audience, or with representing them symbolically.
As long as go as the 5th Century B.C.Chinese philosophers were already arguing about aesthetics. Confucius (551 - 479 B.C.) emphasized the role of the arts and humanities (especially music and poetry) in broadening human nature. His near contemporaryMozi (470 - 391 B.C.), however, argued that music and fine arts were classist and wasteful, benefiting the rich but not the common people.
Western Medieval art (at least until the revival of classical ideals during the Renaissance) was highly religious in focus, and was typically funded by the Church, powerful ecclesiastical individuals, or wealthy secular patrons. A religiously uplifting message was considered more important than figurative accuracy or inspired composition. The skills of the artisan were considered gifts from God for the sole purpose of disclosing God to mankind.
With the shift in Western philosophy from the late 17th Century onwards, German and British thinkers in particular emphasizedbeauty as the key component of art and of the aesthetic experience, and saw art as necessarily aiming at beauty. For Friedrich Schiller (1759 - 1805), aesthetic appreciation of beauty is the most perfect reconciliation of the sensual and rational parts of human nature. Hegel held that art is the first stage in which the absolute spirit is immediately manifest to sense-perception, and is thus an objective rather than a subjective revelation of beauty. For Schopenhauer, aesthetic contemplation of beauty is the most free that the pure intellect can be from the dictates of will.

British Intuitionists like the 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury (1671 - 1713) claimed that beauty is just the sensory equivalent of moral goodness. More analytic theorists like Lord Kames (1696 - 1782), William Hogarth (1697 - 1764) and Edmund Burke hoped to reduce beauty to some list of attributes, while others like James Mill (1773 - 1836) and Herbert Spencer (1820 - 1903) strove to link beauty to some scientific theory of psychology or biology.
free men
رد: By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle
مُساهمة الثلاثاء مارس 08, 2016 2:54 am من طرف free men
Averroism is a Medieval school of philosophy, begun in the late 13th Century, which was based on the works of the 12th Century Arab philosopher Averroës (also known as Ibn Rushd) and his interpretations of Aristotle and his reconciliation ofAristotelianism with the Islamic faith. The movement, which can be considered a type of Scholasticism, is sometimes also known as Radical Aristotelianism or Heterodox Aristotelianism. The term "Averroism" itself was coined as late as the 19th Century.
European philosophers (such as the 13th Century Belgian philosopher Siger of Brabant and the 13th Century Swedish/Danish philosopher Boetius of Dacia) in turn applied these ideas to Aristotle's writings and their relation to the Christian faith, a variant sometimes known as Latin Averroism.
The main ideas of the philosophical concept of Averroism include:

  • there is one truth, but there are (at least) two ways to reach it, through philosophy and through religion;

  • the world is eternal;

  • the soul is divided into two parts, one individual, and one divine;

  • the individual soul is not eternal;

  • all humans at the basic level share one and the same divine soul (an idea known as monopsychism);

  • resurrection of the dead is not possible (this was put forth by Boetius)


Averroës believed that Scripture sometimes uses metaphorical language, and that those without the philosophical trainingto appreciate the true meaning of the passages in question are obliged to believe the literal meaning. Siger expanded this to claim that there exists a "double truth": a factual or "hard" truth that is reached through science and philosophy, and a"religious" truth that is reached through religion. Particularly galling to the Church of the time was the Averroist emphasis on thesuperiority of reason and philosophy over faith and knowledge founded on faith, the independent use of reason, and the idea that the philosophical and religious worlds are separate entities.
Averroism supports the idea that "existence precedes essence" (the philosophic concept based on the idea of existence without essence) in direct opposition to the Essentialism of rival Islamic movements, Avicennism and Illuminationism. Much later, the Transcendent Theosophy of Mulla Sadra (c. 1571 – 1640) in the 17th Century and Existentialism in the 20th Century were to develop this radical idea.
The Roman Catholic Church in the ecclesiastical centres of Paris and Oxford condemned 219 of Averroës' theses in 1277, although many of their objections were identical to the arguments of Al-Ghazali (1058 - 1111) against philosophers in general in his "Incoherence of the Philosophers" (which Averroës had earlier tried to demonstrate to be unjustified). St. Thomas Aquinasopposed Averroism as a dangerous line of thought, and his synthesis of faith and reason (which is at the heart of Thomism) was in specific opposition to Averroism.
Despite the condemnations, many Averroistic theses survived to the 16th Century and can be found in the philosophies of Italian Renaissance thinkers like Pico della Mirandola (1463 - 1494), Giordano Bruno (1548 -1600) and Cesare Cremonini (1550 -1631), who talked about the superiority of philosophers to the common people and the relation between the intellect andhuman dignity.
The pantheistic beliefs of Baruch Spinoza flowed from Averroistic monopsychism, as did his belief in the higher state of the philosophers and tendencies toward secularism (the idea that certain practices or institutions should exist separately from 
 

By Individual Philosopher > Aristotle

الرجوع الى أعلى الصفحة 

صفحة 1 من اصل 1

 مواضيع مماثلة

-
»  By Individual Philosopher > Pythagoras
»  By Individual Philosopher > Maimonides
»  By Individual Philosopher > Pyrrho
»  By Individual Philosopher > Plato
»  By Individual Philosopher > Plotinus

صلاحيات هذا المنتدى:لاتستطيع الرد على المواضيع في هذا المنتدى
** متابعات ثقافية متميزة ** Blogs al ssadh :: Pensée-
انتقل الى: